What is the difference between inflation targeting and price level targeting?

Introduction: The Significance of Monetary Policy

Hello, everyone! Welcome to our article on the fascinating world of monetary policy. At its core, monetary policy refers to the actions and strategies employed by a central bank to manage the money supply and interest rates, with the ultimate goal of stabilizing the economy. Today, we’ll be focusing on two key strategies: inflation targeting and price level targeting.

Inflation Targeting: A Closer Look

Inflation targeting, as the name suggests, revolves around maintaining a specific inflation rate. Central banks that adopt this strategy set a target inflation rate, often around 2%, and adjust their monetary policy tools accordingly to achieve this goal. The idea is to strike a balance, where inflation is neither too high, leading to eroded purchasing power, nor too low, risking deflation and economic stagnation. By providing a clear framework and signaling their intentions, central banks aim to anchor inflation expectations, which can have far-reaching effects on various economic agents.

Price Level Targeting: A Different Approach

While inflation targeting focuses on stabilizing the inflation rate, price level targeting takes a broader perspective. Instead of just targeting the rate of change of prices, it aims to stabilize the overall price level. Under this strategy, if there is a deviation from the target price level, the central bank aims to bring it back on track, even if it means tolerating temporary fluctuations in inflation. By doing so, price level targeting seeks to compensate for past deviations, ensuring a more stable long-term price environment.

The Role of Expectations

One crucial aspect in both strategies is managing expectations. Inflation expectations, for instance, can influence wage negotiations, investment decisions, and even consumer behavior. By adopting a transparent and credible strategy, central banks can shape these expectations, reducing uncertainty and enhancing economic stability. In this regard, inflation targeting, with its clear numerical target, often provides a more straightforward framework for communication and understanding.

Flexibility vs. Commitment

Another differentiating factor is the flexibility inherent in each strategy. Inflation targeting allows for more short-term flexibility, as central banks can adjust their policy tools in response to immediate economic conditions. Price level targeting, on the other hand, requires a more committed approach, as deviations from the target level need to be corrected, even if they are the result of external shocks or temporary factors. This commitment can provide a stronger anchor for long-term expectations but may limit short-term flexibility.

Assessing the Effectiveness

When it comes to evaluating the effectiveness of these strategies, there is no one-size-fits-all answer. It often depends on the specific economic context, the country’s history, and the prevailing challenges. Inflation targeting, with its widespread adoption, has proven to be effective in many cases, helping to maintain price stability and anchor expectations. Price level targeting, while less commonly used, has its proponents, who argue that it can provide a more robust framework, particularly in the face of persistent inflation or deflationary pressures.